![]() |
|
| You are here: Internet For Lawyers> Articles> Los Angeles Daily Journal Online> Page 2> Page 3 | |
| Topics in this
article
Scope of Content is Confounding |
Lack of standard search parameters
between the different sections of the site may cause
confusion: While punctuation is IGNORED when
searching in the Publications section of the
web site (which includes the Daily Journal, House
Counsel, Cyber Esq. and California Lawyer), it is NOT
ignored in the California Opinions, Codes, Constitution
and Rules of Professional Conduct sections of the site.
For example, a search for health providers in
the Publications part of the site will also bring up
results that include health provider's, but
the same search run in the California Opinions section of
the site would not bring up health
provider's. Another non-standard aspect of the site
is the use of date restrictors. They can only be used in
the "Publications" section of the site. Note To Readers: In attempts to include everyday experiences of Daily Journal web site users into this review, I called several law firm librarians for their opinion of the site. One librarian said, What site? I've been waiting all these years for the online Daily Journal and now that it's finally online, I didn't even know. I sensed resentment in her tone. Although the Daily Journal sent letters to all print subscribers, this librarian claimed not to have received one. The same goes for a law firm administrator in Pasadena who asserts that the print subscription is in her name, meaning that she too should have received the notice. Another firm librarian stated that she never received a return call about obtaining her password. And, when I finally did locate a law firm librarian who had seen the site, it turned out that she was referring to the beta site in San Diego and her only comment was The DAR did not look comprehensive online" (it is, I checked the online vs. the print DAR). Track and bill back the cost of searches? We'll end Part I with the question that comes up most often: Can the searches be tracked by client and billed back? Yes. However, there does not appear to be a way to track the amount of time spent on each search, only the dollar amount spent on each search. To charge back searches, fill in the client name (or number) and the matter number in the box located at the top of the search screen, entitled Search Title (optional)/Matter #. I found this awkwardly phrased and would suggest it be re-worded to say Client Name or Number / Matter Name or Number. Part II (coming in February): We'll take a look at the following sections of the DJ's site: Current News Publications, Research (archives), the Current DAR, the DAR archives, California Cases (back to 1934). Part III (coming in March): We'll focus on the following sections: Court Forms (interactive), Court Rules, California Directory of Attorneys, Verdicts & Settlements, California Codes, California Legislation and Judicial Profiles. |
Every month the Internet For Lawyers' free Internet legal research newsletter delivers this kind of useful information to your e-mail inbox.