Newsitem

Google Announces Google Buzz Social Networking Tool

Newsitem

At a live press event at its Mountain View, CA headquarters on the morning of February 9, 2010, Google announced its latest foray into Social Media - Google Buzz. Bradley Horowitz, Google's VP of Product Marketing opened the event by describing Google Buzz as "a Google approach to sharing." Google Buzz incorporates many features of popular social media sites like status updates (Twitter, Facebook), location-based updates (Foursquare, Yelp), and de facto ratings for updates via "likes" and comments (Digg, Facebook).

Todd Jackson, Product Manager for Google Buzz explained that the new service, to be "built directly into Gmail," will easily allow you to locate people you might be interested in by "auto-following" the Gmail contacts who you e-mail and chat with most often. He also described how Google Buzz will be able to aggregate updates those people generate in other social media services whether or not you have have an account there.

When you create an update, you have the option of making it "public" (available to all your followers, posted to your Google Profile, and available in Google Web search) or "private" (sent to select contacts in your Gmail Contact list). Any Gmail user who comes across a public update on your public Profile can comment on that update, whether they're following you or not. The comments are listed below your original update similar to Facebook status updates. At the outset, the default for updates is public. However, if you send a private update, subsequent updates will be private until you change this setting.

Google Buzz includes promises close integration with other Google services like Picasa and Blogger and with non-Google sites like Flickr and Twitter. This includes the ability to "automatically pull headlines and photos from links that you post," similar to Link updates in Facebook. The integration with Twitter entails pulling in all of your public Tweets as Google Buzz updates.

While the service will roll-out to Gmail users over the next few days, Vic Gundotra, Google's VP of Engineering, discussed the mobile version which is available immediately for Nokia, Symbian, Windows Mobile and Android phones. A Web-based app is also available to iPhone and Android phone users - by pointing their Web browsers to http://buzz.google.com. Updates can be created in the mobile version either by typing or speaking (using the Google Voice Shortcut).

With the announcement of Google Buzz, comes a new Buzz layer to Google Maps. The mobile version of Google Buzz incorporates the phones' GPS capabilities to add geographic information (geo-location) to updates sent from the app. The mobile version of Google Buzz allows you to view updates from people you're following or to see location-based updates sent "nearby" your current location displayed on Google Maps as "talk bubble" icons (similar to those in comic strips). They're readable by clicking on the icon.

One limitation we noted in our (previously) limited access to the mobile edition, was the inability to opt out of receiving subsequent comments to a Buzz update we had commented on previously. (Once we commented on a Buzz update, we received threaded updates in our Gmail box each time someone else commented on that update.) This issue is resolved in the Gmail-based version of Google Buzz by selecting Mute this conversation from the drop-down menu next to the Comment link on the right-hand side of the update.

Similarly, the browser-based version of Google Buzz includes another of the features we commented on wanting in the mobile version. In the web-based version, when you set an update to private, the options to whom you do share the update include the groups you'd previously established in Gmail, any individual Gmail contact or follower to whom to send an update (ala Twitter's Direct Message) or multiple Gmail contacts or followers (ala CCs on an e-mail). (After selecting Private from the drop-down menu, select one of your existing Gmail groups or click Create a new group to select individual or multiple contacs to whom you want to send this particular update. Your group will also be saved for the future.)

In addition to the consumer versions of Google Buzz, Google promises a business version in the near future.

CBS News/C|net technology correspondent Larry Magid has raised a number of interesting privacy concerns. Digg and WeFollow founder Kevin Rose and RSS creator Dave Winer pose different sets of concerns in their own blog posts.

In addition to the live announcement event, Google has posted an announcement to its blog and a demo/descriptive video at on YouTube.

American Bar Association Launches Technology Directory/Discount Program

Newsitem

On November 23, The American Bar Association launched its new TechEZ technology marketplace for members. The online directory features nearly two dozen software packages, ranging from time and billing and legal research applications to collaboration tools. It was developed to serve an educational purpose as well as provide special pricing on legal software for ABA members — particularly those in solo practice or small firms who work without the benefit of in-house information technology staff.

The offerings come from more than a dozen vendors, including:

Abacus Data Systems
Copernic Inc.
Protus, provider of MyFax and my1voice
Chrometa
Themis Solutions (CLIO)
Raising the Standard
Ring Central
Box.net
ReputationDefender
Westlaw
LexisNexis

“The ABA believes that making smart choices about technology is essential to getting the best return on the investment,” Catherine Sanders Reach, director of the ABA's Legal Technology Resource Center said in a press release announcing the directory. “We want to help our members learn about new technologies, have access to educational materials and training that strengthens their understanding and efficient use of technology, and receive discounts on technology as a benefit of being an ABA member.”

ABA TechEZ is a collaborative effort of the ABA Legal Technology Resource Center and ABA Member Benefits.

Google Makes Free Caselaw Search Available in Scholar

Newsitem

On the evening of November 17, Google fired (arguably) the loudest and certainly most recent salvo in the battle for free access to case law...and it apparently came as a tweet. Google has made a database of Federal and State caselaw and legal journal articles available via its Google Scholar search. The announcement was apparently made by lawyer-turned-Google-product-manager Rick Klau on Twitter.

Google has posted a more "official" announcement on its blog about the availability of free case law via Google Scholar.

On the Google Scholar Advanced Search page, you can limit results to:

all legal opinions and journals: You cannot limit your search to just journals or just legal opinions.
only US Federal court opinions: You cannot limit your search to just one type of federal court (such as U.S. Supreme Court only).
only state court opinions: You can select any combination of the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

There are no search boxes to search by citation, party name, or judge name, but you can "force" these searches. To force a search by citation, enter it into the Find articles with the exact phrase search box on the Advanced Search page. (Even though a case citation is not an article, the results do include cases).

To force a search by party name, you must first decide if you want to bring back narrow or broad results. For example, in a search for Roe v Wade, the most narrow search strategy would be to enter Roe v Wade into the Find articles with the exact phrase search box, limit your results to Search only US federal court opinions, and from the Find articles where my words occur drop-down menu, select in the title of the article (this will bring back cases, not articles, since you selected Search only US federal court opinions). This brought back two results (the U.S. Supreme Court decision and the Federal District Court decision). Be sure to use "v" and not "versus" or "vs."

The most broad search strategy for research about Roe v Wade (using Scholar) would be to enter the two party names, Roe and Wade into the Find articles with all of the words search box, click into the Search all legal opinions and journals radio button, and from the Find articles where my words occur drop-down menu, select anywhere in the article (this will bring back both cases and articles). This search brought back 31,900 results, from the Roe v Wade case, to state and federal cases and articles citing to Roe v Wade. (Searching Roe and Wade at Google.com brought back over 18 million results.)

To force a search by judge's name, first enter the judge's last name into the search box labeled Return articles written by and then either click into the radio button labeled only U.S. Federal court opinions or only court opinions from the following states (and then choose a state). At the U.S. Supreme Court level, this will bring back any case where the specified judge delivered the opinion, concurred with it, or dissented from it. If you only want cases where a specified U.S. Supreme Court judge delivered the opinion, for example, you could try entering the judge's last name and the word delivered into the phrase box. This is very hit or miss. It's possible a result (or results) could include cases where someone else delivered the opinion but the specified judge was mentioned regarding his/her delivery of another opinion cited to in the case you are viewing.

Google Scholar Case Coverage

Google Scholar has posted some documentation regarding the case coverage of its free case law database. Scroll down the page to see the following: (no changes between 11/17/09 and 1/19/10)

"Currently, Google Scholar allows you to search and read opinions for US state appellate and supreme court cases since 1950, US federal district, appellate, tax and bankruptcy courts since 1923 and US Supreme Court cases since 1791 (please check back periodically for updates to coverage information). In addition, it includes citations for cases cited by indexed opinions or journal articles which allows you to find influential cases (usually older or international) which are not yet online or publicly available. Legal opinions in Google Scholar are provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied on as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed lawyer. Google does not warrant that the information is complete or accurate."

(Thanks to Stuart Sierra for the tip on the link to this addition.)

Stanley also points out that Google links to alternate sources for some cases (in addition to Google's own database version), such as "Cornell's LII, Justia, and Public.Resource.org." Aditionally, he's posted a summary at his own Justia Law, Technology & Marketing blog.

Law Technology News Editor Monica Bay has additional background information on the sources for some of the cases - quoting Klau - on her blog The Common Scold.

The Anatomy of A Google Scholar Legal Opinions and Journals Results List

This is what we've seen in a more-detailed review of the search pages and results.

As a test, we searched for opinions and journal articles related to Roe v Wade. To do so, we typed Roe and Wade into the Find articles with all of the words search box, where we clicked the Search all legal opinions and journals radio button, and selected in the title of the article (from the Find articles where my words occur drop-down menu). [In most of our searches of all legal opinions and journals, it seems that the first result is to the actual case (versus an article or a case citing the actual case). The first result is typically to the official version.]

The first result is to the official U.S. Supreme Court opinion of Roe v Wade. To the right of the case name, note the How cited link. Beneath the case name you will find: (1) one official and two unofficial citations to the case, (2) a brief case annotation, and (3) links to Cited by 23237 (note these numbers may be dfferent by the time you read this), Related articles, and All 6 versions. Clicking the case name link will bring you to the full-text of the case.

(In this example, Cited by 23237, refers to how many books, cases, and articles cited to Roe and Wade. If you click All 6 versions, you will find the text of Roe v Wade [from up to six different sources]. In this particular search, however, there seems to be four sources: two versions were from Cornell, two were from Justia, one was from bulk.resource.org. [a project of Public.Resource.Org] and one was probably from the U.S. Supreme Court.)

The third result is to a Yale Law Journal article and beneath the article title and brief annotation you will find: Cited by 1543, Related articles, and All 6 versions.

Anatomy of Google Scholar Case Search Results

Case results include:

Full text of the returned case
links to other cases cited in the returned case (but not to the exact page numbers when cited)

Also included when you are reading a case is a How Cited tab, which includes:

How this document has been cited: a snippet of text is displayed that attempts to show how your case was treated in the citing case or journal article. Clicking on one of these snippets takes you directly to the location of the snippet in the citing case - which should be the location of your cited case - if the case is being displayed from Google's collection of free cases. Journal citations are also included in this list. Some journals coming from non-Google sources are in the form of PDFs. In those instances, you're taken to the beginning of the article or to a log-in/payment page of the [non-Google] database vendor.
Cited by: lists (and links) to cases, books, and journal articles citing the case you're reading. (Clicking on a case citation link takes you to the first page of the case, not to the exact pin-point page where your case is cited.)
Related Documents: lists related cases and journal articles that might have similar fact patterns (or could be a countersuit, for instance).

Nowhere does Google explain the difference between How this document has been cited and Cited by. From what we can tell, there are more documents in the Cited by section and, as noted above, How this document has been cited takes you to pinpoint pages while Cited by does not.

Research Alert: Does Google Scholar's Case Law Database Include Shepard's or West's Key-Cite?

No. However, the How this document has been cited and Cited by features are Google's attempt to update the case you are reading, but there is no editorial treatment to tell you how the citing cases treated the case you're reading - that determination is up to you. The How this document has been cited and Cited by features are definitely a step in the right direction.

There will be, no doubt, many who point out inadequacies of the search and coverage of the database, but remember that this free caselaw research. And if all you need to do is read the text of an opinion, how can you beat free?

For more information on locating free and low-cost investigative and legal research resources on the Internet, see the newly-revised and expanded 10th anniversary edition of "The Cybersleuth's Guide to the Internet."

Ari Kaplan interviews Klau regarding his work at Google and his role in the Google Scholar/Case Law project.

Librarians Gary Price and Shirl Kennedy have a nice review at their Resource Shelf blog.

Law librarian Richard Leiter weighs in on his blog The Life of Books.

Ernie (The Attorney) Svenson's shares his take on the Google Scholar free case law search on his blog.

California lawyer Dan Friedlander shares his views on the Google Scholar free case law search on his Law on My Phone blog.

Sneak Peek at Google's Infrastructure Update - Caffeine

Newsitem

Early in 2009, a team of Google Web developers began work on the "next generation" of Google search infrastructure. The stated goal of the project, code-named Caffeine, was to help Google "push the envelope on size, indexing speed, accuracy, comprehensiveness and other dimensions" of Web search. The project was announced publicly in August 2009 in a post on Google's Webmaster Central Blog. In a separate blog post, Google software engineer Matt Cutts noted that, "this update is primarily under the hood: we’re rewriting the foundation of some of our infrastructure. But some of the search results do change."

In the meantime, we've conducted a number of test searches. The vast majority of the results seem to be the same in both searches however they are not in the same order. Additionally, the new Caffeine infrastructure seems to rank results from social networking sites such as Twitter, Linkedin, and Facebook higher than in the current search results.

Caffeine also seems to be living up to its size objective. Test Caffeine searches for pages from an individual Web site (e.g. just from www.netforlawyers.com) returned 10% more pages than the same search from the current search infrastructure.

Google has made a preview version of the search available at http://www2.sandbox.google.com/.

Non-Google-affiliated Web developer Carter Cole has even created a page where you can search both versions of Google simultaneously and compare the results side by side.

Google has not yet announced when the changes incorporated into Caffeine will be "live" at www.google.com.

Adobe Connect Now Offers Free and Low Cost Video Conferencing

Newsitem

One of my current favorite "tightwad tech" tools is Adobe's free ConnectNow remote meeting service. It offers a lot of flexibility for a free service. It includes video conferencing, chat, screen sharing, and a multi-user whiteboard. It even offers the ability for one participant to remotely control the computer of another participant - with prior permission of course. The service is browser based, making it "platform agnostic." It doesn't matter what operating system you're using, all you need is an Internet connection, a browser, and the latest Adobe Flash player and you're in business.

The biggest limitation is the three attendee limit for meetings. Monthly/annual subscription upgrades are also available for five-or twenty-person meetings. ConnectNow is essentially a limited-use trial of Adobe's ConnectPro software, but the available features make it useful for small meetings or collaborations. For more information see http://www.adobe.com/acom/connectnow/ or http://www.acrobat.com.

The 'Death' of Jeff Goldblum, et al | The Importance of Verifying Sources on the Internet

Newsitem

In our live Internet research MCLE presentations we repeatedly stress the importance of verifying not just the veracity of the information we find on the Internet, but also the trustworthiness of the sources themselves.

Today, June 25, 2009 is a perfect example of why this is so important. This morning Farrah Fawcett died. For hours, mainstream news sources obituaries and published retrospectives on her life and career. Fawcett had been battling cancer for some time, so her death, while tragic, was not completely unexpected.

Later in the day the news flashes began that Michael Jackson had been rushed to the hospital. With only the slimmest facts, sites alternately reported that he was "not doing well," "in a coma," dead," or some combination of these conditions. Whether through superior reporting, faster typists, or a willingness to report "news" from a single source, celebrity gossip site TMZ.com was the first to report that Jackson had died. It was approximately a half-hour before other mainstream news sources like the LA TImes, Associated Press, ABC News, etc. reported their own confirmed versions of the death of Michael Jackson.

I include all of the foregoing as background. Not because a "gossip" site beat out "major" news organizations to report the day's biggest story, but because of the unsubstantiated rumor mill these stories spawned.

Within about an hour of Jackson's death being reported, posts began appearing on Twitter, Facebook and other Social Media sites with news of the death of George Clooney, Jeff Goldblum, or Harrison Ford. If you believed everything you read on these sites then the apocalypse had surely come to Hollywood. The only problem was that none of these posts were true.

From this vantage point, it's easy enough to say, "Of course that can't be true. Who would believe what they read in a tweet?" But, most of these messages were accompanied by links to "news stories" that "reported" these very events from the very official sounding "Global Associated News." Many of the posts came from reputable professional individuals who otherwise should have known better, but they too received the links from individuals they had relied on in the past for useful information. Some passed the rumors on more in an effort to verify them - in the vein of "Is it true that Jeff Goldblum is dead?" The repetition of the stories and links reached such a pitch, that the top results for searches in Google News for "Jeff Goldblum" were reports of his supposed death.

That these rumors were all (eventually) proven to be false is one clear indicator that "Global Associated News" does not have the reporting skills or trustworthiness of even TMZ.com. This all would have been so much easier if any of the people who had read the "Global Associated News" stories had taken the time to scroll down to the bottom of the page. Very clearly, the pages were marked with the legend, "this story was dynamically generated using a generic 'template' and is not factual. Any reference to specific individuals has been 100% fabricated by web site visitors who have created fake stories by entering a name into a blank 'non-specific' template for the purpose of entertainment."

These are really extreme cases of not verifying one's sources, but remains an excellent example, nevertheless.

Hands-on with iPhone OS 3.0

Newsitem

I've been working with the the new iPhone OS 3.0 (beta 7) for about a week-and-a-half. There are a number of completely new features built into the operating system and some that just extend the range of features already included in the current release version. It's a toss-up which of the new features I'm enjoying most, but here's a run-down of some of the ones I'm using most. This is just a brief overview of some of the most-talked about features of the iPhone's new OS. It is not meant to be an exhaustive review of the Operating System's features. If you have questions, please direct them to mrosch@netforlawyers.com or @MarkRosch on Twitter.

Landscape Keyboard

Like just about every iPhone user I've talked to, I couldn't understand why the landscape keyboard wasn't available in the iPhone's Mail client. Thankfully, that oversight has been resolved with the new OS with the landscape keyboard being available to all apps. My fingers are pretty average sized, but keying in an e-mail in portrait mode can be more than a bit tedious. It's a little thing, but having the landscape keyboard available in Mail is a big deal for me. While all apps are supposed to be compatible with OS 3.0 by its (expected) June 8 release date, there doesn't seem to be an update yet for the excellent Email 'n' Walk app that integrates the landscape keyboard.

Cut/Copy/Paste

Also new in iPhone OS 3.0 is the ability to cut, copy and paste text - either within an application or between different applications. This is a huge step forward. Until now, editing an e-mail in progress - moving a block of text from one paragraph to another - involved alot of deleting and retyping. Now, tapping anywhere in a text block brings up the "Select/Select All/Paste" menu. Choosing "Select" highlights the word where you've placed the cursor. You also have the ability stretch the highlighted area to select more text to cut/copy. Touching the screen again to place the cursor in the position where you want to paste the new text brings the "Select/Select All/Paste" menu back to the screen. Clicking "Paste" does just that. The process is not all that dis-similar to the "tap and hold" process on Windows Mobile/Pocket PC devices. One big difference is shaking the iPhone to undo a paste action. The new OS also supports copying images, but I really haven't had any need for that function yet.The iPhone even retains the items in the clipboard after it wakes from sleep mode and/or locks.

Undo Typing

You can also Undo Typing in (semingly) any app you can type in. Shaking the iPhone when typing in multiple apps (e.g. Mail, SMS, TwitterFon, Safari) brought up an "Undo Typing/Cancel" dialog box. I'm assuming that this is a universal function available to all OS 3.0 compliant iPhine apps.

Spotlight Search

Swiping the Home screen to the right brings up the device-wide Spotlight search interface. Typing a term into the search box searches across all files on the iPhone (Contacts, Apps, image names, song titles, emails, notes, and calendar entries). Interestingly Spotlight doesn't take advantage of the new landscape keyboard. The Spotlight search box also shows up at the top of the Contacts list when it's accessed to make drilling down into even the longest Contacts list much faster than swiping.

Improved Features in Stock App

In addition to checking stock index or individual stock prices, swiping the price chart at the bottom of the Stock display to the left, now displays stock-related news from a variety of different major news sources.

Voice Memo

After upgrading my iPhone to OS 3.0 a new Voice Memo app appeared on the Home screen. It allows me to record audio notes and send them via e-mail or multimedia messages. (MMS is also a new feature set to replace the previous SMS Message app-available from AT&T in US later this Summer).

Shake n Shuffle

When using the iPod functions of the iPhone, I can invoke it's shuffle feature and skip from the song I'm listening to another random song on the device by shaking the phone. Oddly, it seems to prefer up and down shaking rather than side to side.

Addition to Visual Voicemail

Also, the iPhone's visual voicemail adds city and state location information for numbers that are not in your Contacts list.

What's Not Included (Yet)

There have been numerous reports of the ability to "tether" the iPhone to your computer - to use it as a modem through which to access the Internet at 3G speed with a Mac or PC. Apple says you'll be able to seamlessly connect via Bluetooth or USB. However, this feature seems to be turned off in the version of the OS I'm running. Apple says it will have 22 carriers on board at launch. AT&T was not included in the slide at their World Wide Developers Conference Keynote presentation. Some reports have indicated that this tethered connectivity would not be covered by AT&T's current "unlimited" iPhone data plan and will require an additional contract. (I haven't had a chance to try out the peer-to-peer connectivity between iPhones using Wi-Fi or Bleutooth.)

There are also a number of other reported new features in the new OS that I haven't investigated:

Bluetooth A2DP stereo headset connection (it has also been reported that developers will be able to incorporate external accessories into their applications)
Automatic Wi-Fi log-in to paid hotspots (autofill)
Enhanced security/anti-phishing notifications in Safari
Rent or purchase movies, TV shows, music videos, audio books on iTunes
Enhanced parental controls for video, apps, web, and music
"Find My Phone" feature (available to MobileMe customers)
- Includes ability to send remote "wipe" command to delete data if you lose your phone
Developers will also be able to include the ability for users to make micropayments from within apps
Support for Hebrew, Arabic, Korean, Thai on keyboard (portrait and landscape keyboards)

Internet For Lawyers Sets Continuing Legal Education Seminars for Summer 2009

Newsitem

Internet For Lawyers has set the following slate of live and video Continuing Legal Education seminars in Colorado, New Mexico, and Virginia during the Summer of 2009

These seminars are specifically designed to benefit all legal professionals, including lawyers, paralegals, law office administrators and other support staff.

Scheduled seminars include:

June 2009

• June 5 - Social Media (Twitter, MySpace, Facebook, & LinkedIn) as an Investigative Research Tool; Jackrabbit Bar Assoc.; Santa Fe, NM
• July 19 - The Cybersleuth's Guide To The Internet; Colorado Bar Assoc.; Denver, Colorado Springs, & Grand Junction (Video Replay)

August 2009

• August 12 - The Cybersleuth's Guide To Investigative Research; Virginia CLE; Richmond, VA

Septenber 2009

• September 5 - Technology Tools and Tips Title: The Newest Investigative Tool on the Internet - Social Networking Sites; Hispanic National Bar Assoc.; Albuquerque, NM
• September 15 - The Cybersleuth's Guide To Investigative Research; New York City Bar Assoc.; New York City

See our full calendar of live MCLE (Continuing Legal Education) seminars - http://www.netforlawyers.com/seminars-events.htm.

LegalTech West Coast Returns to Los Angeles | Registration Discounts Available

Newsitem

On June 24 and 25, 2009, American Lawyer Media's LegalTech, the largest annual gathering of legal technologists on the West Coast, returns to Los Angeles. This year marks the conference's third consecutive year in its new home at the Los Angeles Convention Center in downtown Los Angeles. LegalTech is the one of the largest technology events of the year, and highly regarded among those in the legal technology industry. With conferences and trade shows in both New York and Los Angeles, LegalTech is a key resource for law firms and legal departments to get hands-on practical information for improving their law practice management. All readers of this newsletter can attend the exhibit hall free of charge by downloading and printing this admission card mailing and faxing it to ALM by June 16 OR bringing it to the show to register on-site (*see below). This complimentary pass includes entry to both Keynote Sessions, both days of Exhibits, SuperSessions and ALL Educational Programs in the Emerging Technology Track (unless otherwise noted in the program), as well as the exhibit hall. Those with questions or comments regarding the 2009 LegalTech West Coast Conference can contact ALM Events at (212) 457-7905. Additional registration information and the complete conference schedule is available online at https://secure.lawcatalog.com/almevents/almevents_registration.cfm?semin.... Internet For Lawyers (IFL) subscribers can also claim an additional 20% discount on full conference registration by selecting the "MasterPass Discounted for Association Members" option on the registration page (a $120 savings). Produced by ALM Events, LegalTech is the number one resource for law firms and legal departments to get hands-on practical information for improving their law practice management. The conference provides an in-depth look at what the technological world has in store for you and your practice, and it offers an expansive exhibit floor with the most extensive gathering of innovative products designed to meet your current and future technology needs. The faculty at this year’s event includes the legal industry’s top technologists, including Law Technology News magazine's Editor-in-Chief Monica Bay; Texas attorney/technologist Craig Ball; California attorney Browning Marean; and Steve Harmon, Director of Legal Services for Cisco, among others. *Download Free Exhibit Hall Registration Card here.

Internet For Lawyers Sets Continuing Legal Education Seminars Summer 2008

Newsitem

Internet For Lawyers Sets Continuing Legal Education Seminars

Internet For Lawyers has set the following slate of live and video Continuing Legal Education seminars in Texas; Wisconsin; Washington, DC and Southern California during Summer 2008.

These seminars are specifically designed to benefit all legal professionals, including lawyers, paralegals, law office administrators and other support staff.

Scheduled seminars include:

July 2008

Search

Newsitem

Closure links